Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a fantastic alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into your mouth, which means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke a different one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer podsmall.com make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco in to the marketplace.
And also the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes available to buy could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement for tobacco companies to add warning labels on the products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which implies that fewer people will purchase them.